欢迎来到51Due,请先 | 注册
关注我们: 51due论文代写二维码 51due论文代写平台微博
英国论文代写,英国essay代写知名品牌微信

Essay代写范文

为您解决留学中生活、学习、工作的困难、疑惑
释放自我

英国essay代写-Kierkegaard’s works

2017-10-12 | 来源:51due教员组 | 类别:Essay代写范文

本篇英国essay代写-Kierkegaard’s works讨论了Kierkegaard的作品涵盖的主题,包括知识和自我,闲置和无聊,以及真相的相对性。在1835年的吉列列,他在他的杂志上写道:“我真正缺少的是要清楚我所做的是什么,而不是我所知道的,除非某种知识必须先于每一个行动。本篇essay代写由51due代写平台整理,供大家参考阅读。


This essay will discuss the topics cover by Kierkegaard’s works, including knowledge and self, idleness and boredom, as well as relativity of truth. In Gilleleie, 1835, Søren Kierkegaard wrote in his journal: “What I really lack is to be clear in my mind what I am to do, not what I am to know, except in so far as a certain knowledge must precede every action. The thing is to understand myself, to see what God really wishes me to do: the thing is to find a truth which is true for me, to find the idea for which I can live and die. ... I certainly do not deny that I still recognize an imperative of knowledge and that through it one can work upon men, but it must be taken up into my life, and that is what I now recognize as the most important thing (pp 4).”


In this quote, Kierkegaard argues for the importance of self as the fundamental of application of any knowledge. He believes that in order for any knowledge to be truly meaningful, it has to be connected to the “self” that would apply such a knowledge. Knowledge on its own is empty and meaningless. Only when it serves as the guidance and directions for people can it gain its true value. By such arguments, Kierkegaard manages to stress on the utilitarian side of human knowledge. Kierkegaard also states that the personal beliefs are just as important as the “universal truths.” He believes that there is the relativity of truth depending on the subjects. For each individual, a version of truth that is adequate as a guidance in life is good enough. However, such a statement may not be valid of all times since it separates the “self” from the society and human race. Therefore, Kierkegaard adds by acknowledging the imperative of knowledge, making his argument more rigorous and complete.


Søren Kierkegaard wrote in Either/Or: A Fragment of Life: “Idleness, we are accustomed to say, is the root of all evil. To prevent this evil, work is recommended.... Idleness as such is by no means a root of evil; on the contrary, it is truly a divine life, if one is not bored.... (pp 24)” Kierkegaard first presents the claim that he disagrees with, which is a common belief that idleness is the source of evil. He then refutes the claim by saying that idleness is truly a divine life, under the condition that one is not bored. Instead of idleness, Kierkegaard believes that boredom is the root of all evil. To support his unique point of view, Kierkegaard provides examples of both children and adults, proving that as boredom increases, evil in the world follows. He then relates the topic to religion and the bible, making his argument more effective for the readers. It was boredom that make the gods create the world, the men have it populated etc. Boredom serves as the motivations for almost all human activities attempting to achieve happiness, or as Kierkegaard believes, idleness. Finally, Kierkegaard concludes that idleness, like how the Olympian gods live their lives, is truly divine.


Reading the last section of Kierkegaard’s journals, one question occurred to me: Is Truth objective? Truth, from its literal meaning, is the true facts about the world we live in. it seems rather meaningless to question its objectivity. However, in his work, Kierkegaard argues that “truth is subjectivity.” By Googling the question, I found that many people do not believe in the absolute truth, including the laws of the nature. For example, we may perceive it to be true that the sky is blue, but this truth seems meaningless to those who are color-blind. Our perception of this world is limited by our senses. Even the physical laws that we have discovered may be proven wrong someday in the future. However, such claims contradict the fundamentals that our world is built on: if there is no universal truth how can different people communicate and come to an understanding? The idea of relative truth is mentioned multiple times to solve the problem. Despite the debate on the existence of a universal truth, all human beings have established a set of truth that serve as the rules for everyone on earth to follow. This set of truth can be viewed as relative truth for the mankind, which is also the only truth that we know. There may be beings somewhere in the universe that follow a completely different set of truth, for example: 1+1=3. But before discoveries of such beings are made, I think it is safe for now to regard our truths as the universal ones.


要想成绩好,英国论文得写好,51due代写平台为你提供英国留学资讯,专业辅导,还为你提供专业英国essay代写,paper代写,report代写,需要找论文代写的话快来联系我们51due工作客服QQ:800020041或者wechat:Abby0900吧。—Ace

我们的优势

  • 05年成立,已帮助上万人
  • 24小时专业客服
  • 团队成员都毕业于全球著名高校
  • 保证原创,支持检测

英国站